Naomi
28th July 2007, 11:53 AM
Hi! I have been poking around this forum for a few days, and my head is swimming. :)
I have been to Australia several times, but never to NZ. However, when my husband and I began to look at countries to which we might emigrate, New Zealand clearly stood out as the winning choice for us. We do plan to take a trip and check things out, but we aren't sure if we will start applying for PR as a skilled migrant beforehand or not. We would be relying on my husband's points to bring us both over.
The points system has us flumoxed. Part of this is because my husband's skill set happens to encompass two future growth areas: He is a Java software developer (so ICT), who has specialized in Bioinfomatics software for the last 6 years (so that is biotech). We were thinking it might be more advantageous for him to apply in biotech, because his BA is in Chemistry, with a minor in biochemistry, but he doesn't have a Computer Science degree (common in the Silicon Valley). Does that sound reasonable?
But, because of the Java programming, does that mean we can *also* claim points in a Long Term Skills Shortage? Or is that prohibited? He would also theoretically be eligible for bonuses for work experience in both areas (long terms skill shortage, and future growth area).
Am I over-counting?
I *think* that even by the most stingy measures, we have over 140 points for an EOI (I am getting 145 at the moment). I do understand that a point change is about to go into effect, but the basic premise appears to be the same, and the point changes were announced, is that correct?
Sorry to go off like this on my very first post, but this point issue has been driving me around the bend! I just would like to know one way or the other, are we over or under 140? I know we have enough points to get into the general pool.
Thanks! This forum is enormously helpful!
I have been to Australia several times, but never to NZ. However, when my husband and I began to look at countries to which we might emigrate, New Zealand clearly stood out as the winning choice for us. We do plan to take a trip and check things out, but we aren't sure if we will start applying for PR as a skilled migrant beforehand or not. We would be relying on my husband's points to bring us both over.
The points system has us flumoxed. Part of this is because my husband's skill set happens to encompass two future growth areas: He is a Java software developer (so ICT), who has specialized in Bioinfomatics software for the last 6 years (so that is biotech). We were thinking it might be more advantageous for him to apply in biotech, because his BA is in Chemistry, with a minor in biochemistry, but he doesn't have a Computer Science degree (common in the Silicon Valley). Does that sound reasonable?
But, because of the Java programming, does that mean we can *also* claim points in a Long Term Skills Shortage? Or is that prohibited? He would also theoretically be eligible for bonuses for work experience in both areas (long terms skill shortage, and future growth area).
Am I over-counting?
I *think* that even by the most stingy measures, we have over 140 points for an EOI (I am getting 145 at the moment). I do understand that a point change is about to go into effect, but the basic premise appears to be the same, and the point changes were announced, is that correct?
Sorry to go off like this on my very first post, but this point issue has been driving me around the bend! I just would like to know one way or the other, are we over or under 140? I know we have enough points to get into the general pool.
Thanks! This forum is enormously helpful!