james the mechanic
13th October 2007, 08:52 AM
Today, I took the train up to London to the Expo. Whilst there I harangued several hapless employees of the High Commission who I interrogated until they broke under the strain and agreed to process my application post haste next week at Wednesdays EOI selection as I now have a job offer that I must take up in the first week of Feb and so can’t have many more delays.
So it was back to the good old favourite website to do another EOI. You might think that they could just change the one they threw out last week, but oh no. That would be much too easy and simple!
I am now having another problem with the ambiguous EOI.
At the start of section E, you are presented with the statement:
In this section you qualify for points and bonus points, depending on whether you have current skilled employment in New Zealand or an offer of skilled employment in New Zealand.
And question E1, at the start of section E, asks:
E1. Are you claiming points for skilled employment, and declare that you meet policy criteria for any of the following?
* Current skilled employment in New Zealand for 12 months or more
* Current skilled employment in New Zealand less than 12 months
* Offer of skilled employment in New Zealand
* None of the above [Go to the next section]
I therefore choose the third of these, as I have an offer of skilled employment. I then see the second page of section E, questions E2-E6.
However, this second page states, close to the top of the page:
PLEASE NOTE: Your main occupation in New Zealand is the job you spent the most hours doing while in New Zealand. If you have not worked in New Zealand you should not complete any of section E in this form.
Now this makes no sense, as you cannot leave this page blank - all of the fields are mandatory.
Which of these two conflicting instructions are correct for section E – if I don’t put the details for the offer of skilled employment, I lose the points awarded for it. However, this goes against the clear instruction on that page. If I selected ‘None of the above’, I would not be providing them with any details of the job offer, which also makes no sense.
Has anyone clarified this situation with Immigration.govt.nz – what was the outcome?
An amusing story from the Expo – in one of the seminars, a chap stood up and pointed out how hard it was to fill in the EOI and was asking if he would be better off getting an immigration consultant to help. The staff from NZ Immigration said that anyone with a modicum of intelligence should fine it no trouble and should be able to fill it all out in a couple of hours. Our hero who asked the question pointed out that he only had a PhD and had practically given up on the damm thing. The NZ Immigration chap then said something along the lines of “There isn’t much I can say to that, is there?”:laugh
On the subject of Expo, very good this year – however there appears to be less stands than last year.
James
So it was back to the good old favourite website to do another EOI. You might think that they could just change the one they threw out last week, but oh no. That would be much too easy and simple!
I am now having another problem with the ambiguous EOI.
At the start of section E, you are presented with the statement:
In this section you qualify for points and bonus points, depending on whether you have current skilled employment in New Zealand or an offer of skilled employment in New Zealand.
And question E1, at the start of section E, asks:
E1. Are you claiming points for skilled employment, and declare that you meet policy criteria for any of the following?
* Current skilled employment in New Zealand for 12 months or more
* Current skilled employment in New Zealand less than 12 months
* Offer of skilled employment in New Zealand
* None of the above [Go to the next section]
I therefore choose the third of these, as I have an offer of skilled employment. I then see the second page of section E, questions E2-E6.
However, this second page states, close to the top of the page:
PLEASE NOTE: Your main occupation in New Zealand is the job you spent the most hours doing while in New Zealand. If you have not worked in New Zealand you should not complete any of section E in this form.
Now this makes no sense, as you cannot leave this page blank - all of the fields are mandatory.
Which of these two conflicting instructions are correct for section E – if I don’t put the details for the offer of skilled employment, I lose the points awarded for it. However, this goes against the clear instruction on that page. If I selected ‘None of the above’, I would not be providing them with any details of the job offer, which also makes no sense.
Has anyone clarified this situation with Immigration.govt.nz – what was the outcome?
An amusing story from the Expo – in one of the seminars, a chap stood up and pointed out how hard it was to fill in the EOI and was asking if he would be better off getting an immigration consultant to help. The staff from NZ Immigration said that anyone with a modicum of intelligence should fine it no trouble and should be able to fill it all out in a couple of hours. Our hero who asked the question pointed out that he only had a PhD and had practically given up on the damm thing. The NZ Immigration chap then said something along the lines of “There isn’t much I can say to that, is there?”:laugh
On the subject of Expo, very good this year – however there appears to be less stands than last year.
James