logo

  New Zealand Immigration Guide









Kim39
18th March 2005, 10:33 PM
18.03.05 1.00pm


A new health screening regime for immigrants to New Zealand has been put on hold after doctors objected to the costs and time involved.

Starting next month immigrants were expected to answer a 27-page health check report and undergo a battery of tests.

The Labour Department has now admitted that the screening regime is too tough and that it needs to be reviewed.

The New Zealand Medical Association said it held grave concerns about the time involved in the testing for GPs, the expense for potential immigrants, and the compulsory nature of the screening.

Chairman Peter Foley said he was disappointed the association had not been consulted about the issues earlier.

Increased tuberculosis screening of migrants would still get under way on April 4, the Immigration Service announced today.

However, the implementation of other health screening tests, also planned to roll out next month, had been deferred,

From next month, all potential migrants who are a high TB risk and are planning to be in New Zealand for six months or more, will be tested. The age at which TB screening is required will be lowered from 12 years to 11 years.

Potential migrants are considered a TB risk if they are a citizen of a country with a high incidence of the disease, or they have spent three months or more in a country with high TB rates in the past five years.

Mary Anne Thompson, the department's deputy secretary, workforce, said next month's TB screening changes follow a stepped approach.

Screening of international students began in June 2004, followed by visitor and work visa applicants five months later in November 2004.

From next month, the interim exemption granted to working holidaymakers intending on being here for at least six months would be lifted.

Ms Thompson said the remaining health screening requirements had been deferred, following feedback from doctors.

"The objective of the policy, to manage potential health risks of immigration, without discouraging potential migrants, remains unchanged," she said.

"Our intention is to make sure that people migrating to New Zealand are healthy and aren't likely to need expensive, or extensive medical care in the foreseeable future."

Ms Thompson said she hoped the remaining changes to the screening programme could be implemented in July, but that depended on progress with the review.

Under existing policy, immigrants wanting to stay in New Zealand for two years or more have to undergo a medical examination. Under the planned changes the medical will be needed for those wanting to stay one year or more.

Currently, a full medical history of applicants is taken and some tests, including those for syphilis, salmonella, or evidence of intestinal parasites may be required.

Under the planned regime, if the full medical identified any problems, a specialist's report could be called for and included with the application.

The tests were also to have included one blood sample for those older than 11, and one urine sample for those over five.

This would enable tests for Hepatitis B and C, liver function, HIV, syphilis, and serum creatinine (kidney failure).

Ms Thompson said the department had already consulted organisations and agencies such as the Ministry of Health, the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners, District Health Boards, medical and specialist colleges and migrant groups, but that further discussions were planned

Moorf
18th March 2005, 10:46 PM
Result! :nice1

It does echo what my GP here in NZ said about the forms - he was gobsmacked at them (he had them to "comment" on a month or so ago) - seems others agreed :nice1

Babette & Andy
21st March 2005, 07:49 PM
Same here - the Doc we saw in Manchester was up in arms about the new rulings. Said he had raised a complaint with the British Medical Council, as he didn't think it made any sense to 'stick your fingers in places when people aren't ill' :mrgreen:
Good to see that NZIS have listened to many comments made across the world and in NZ too.

Babette

Jo and Andy
23rd March 2005, 10:38 PM
This is all good news but I am a bit confused.

I am waiting for my medicals back from the Dr's everything else ready for the ITA to be sent off.

Do I need to rush for the 4th April now, the Dr's are saying they might not have it ready until the 31st, doesn't give much time to send it.

(Their fault too, said he had a big heart from their X-ray, and had to have a cardiologists report (£500 and the cardiologist said they took Andy's X-ray incorrectly, but he has still done everything really quickly), faxed the results to them last friday, again Monday, as they said they had not received them).

I worry I won't get it in in time. AHHHHHHHH :wah

Is it a sign. :?

Milliemoo
23rd March 2005, 10:57 PM
Hi Jo (or Andy)

Don't worry. You don't need to have it in by the 4th April :P

BTW I hope you get a refund for that £500 ! It's not your fault they took the x-ray wrong!

Milliemoo :nice1

Jo and Andy
24th March 2005, 01:59 AM
Thanks Millimoo

Just got the bill and it is not as bad £375. can't decide whether to hassel the Dr's now saying pull your finger out, it's your fault, or wait let them get on with it and then say something after.

Well as long as I get there, feel better it does not have to be in by the 4th now (1st as 4th is a Monday), more time to check it through. But I think I have everything. Originals and 1 photocopy forthem 1 for me.

It is just soooo scarey, I want to go but I don't want to leave, if that makes sense.

Well good news on the mega health checks for the moment, feel sorry for those who have already had them done, for no reason. (there was one done at the Dr's when I went there.)


Jo (Andy hardly ever does any of this).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15