Abnormal medical findings - IVF and Cholesterol
Starkus71
1st October 2009, 04:26 AM
Hi Guys,
We are applying with my OH as the principal applicant and the medicals have come back today. His are fine but for mine, the doc has ticked significant/ abnormal findings:
Significant as we are currently undergoing IVF treatment
Abnormal as cholesterol is outside the range at 5.3 (should be <5.0) and LDL is 3.5 (should be <3.0).
Does anyone know if these results are likely to be referred to the medical assessor? I've read on some threads about a 10% variance can sometimes be applied - has anyone any recent experience of this being used?
Any info would be great.
Mamee & Co
1st October 2009, 05:06 AM
I can't comment upon the cholesterol results but as someone who has been there just wanted to wish you lots of luck with the IVF.
L00pback
1st October 2009, 09:27 AM
"I can't comment upon the cholesterol results but as someone who has been there just wanted to wish you lots of luck with the IVF."
and from us too.
Emma
jeffanar
1st October 2009, 09:59 AM
Well I don't know about the IVF, but my OH had slightly high blood pressure so had to get the extra bloods including cholesterol, which was slightly elevated (not sure of the actual figure sorry) so his medicals were sent to the Medical Assessor, who obviously thought it wasn't a problem cos they approved his PR, it just meant it took slightly longer.
I think if your cholesterol is outside their specific 'normal' limits the doctor will have to tick the 'abnormal findings' box, so they will have to be sent to the medical asessor, but that doesn't necessarily mean that it will be a problem.
72andsunny
1st October 2009, 11:59 AM
Abnormal as cholesterol is outside the range at 5.3 (should be <5.0) and LDL is 3.5 (should be <3.0).
In the absence of other risk factors these numbers are pretty close to the normal range. <3.0 is for a person with two risk factors--your doctor has done you a disservice by checking the abnormal box.
kara_m
1st October 2009, 09:00 PM
when i did my medical it came back with abnormal results on the white blood cell count, when the doctor called to say the results were back, he suggested waiting a few more weeks and go and repeat the test at the gps so i did that and it came back a bit higher and i submitted it and had no problems with it.
Not sure how long it would take for the cholestrol to go down slightly.
good luck with the ivf
Susan2502
1st October 2009, 09:03 PM
Yes, my bloods were sent to the medical assessor, my gp said they were normal levels but I think like yours the one was .3 out by their standards. Its been a month now... :(
Starkus71
2nd October 2009, 02:02 AM
Thanks guys for the support, its much appreciated. I read the medical handbook again last night and it does say to record a normal finding only if there isn't any history of operations/ ongoing treatments etc, lucky me I get a double-whammy!!
Fingers crossed - huge pile of paperwork is ready to be sent off tomorrow with the application, personally I feel sorry for the CO who has to go through it all!!
norma
2nd October 2009, 10:07 AM
In the absence of other risk factors these numbers are pretty close to the normal range. <3.0 is for a person with two risk factors--your doctor has done you a disservice by checking the abnormal box.
Having just had a routine cholesterol test in NZ (not for a medical), my GP told me that the standard used in NZ is LDL level should be < 2.0 and total cholesterol < 4.0. I think the UK uses 3.0 and 5.0, but a web site I looked at recently said that this is under review.
72andsunny
2nd October 2009, 01:49 PM
Having just had a routine cholesterol test in NZ (not for a medical), my GP told me that the standard used in NZ is LDL level should be < 2.0 and total cholesterol < 4.0. I think the UK uses 3.0 and 5.0, but a web site I looked at recently said that this is under review.
I'm guessing the doctor is refering to this document (table 10 on page 16): http://www.nzgg.org.nz/guidelines/0154/CVD_handbook_june_2009_update.pdf
The guideline recommends <2.0 mmol/L (that's about 77 mg/dL for my fellow Americans) for patients with "multiple risk factors". It does not make much sense to discuss a laboratory result for someone with multiple risk factors for cv disease on this forum, as that person would certainly be denied entry (with or without an abnormal lab value)...which was why I indicated that 3.5 mmol/L is close to normal in the absence of other risk factors.
Carey
2nd October 2009, 06:11 PM
The Dr asked quite a few questions about our IVF and 5 miscarriages but as all were more than 6 yrs ago, did not mark as significant as we emphasized we had completed our family. So it shouldn't be an issue I wouldn't think.
Our report came back as significant for my low bone density and the medical assessor was consulted but after I spoke to my GP and copied all documentation from the specialist, it was all OK. It just all took time which was frustrating.
Very best of luck with yours and especially with the IVF; it's very tough to get through but keep positive if you can.
globetrecker
13th October 2009, 12:39 PM
Something that may help re: lowering cholesterol. My mom back in the U.S. is in nursing and has had many patients needing to lower their cholesterol w/o paying for expensive drugs. They all swear by red yeast rice capsules, and apparently it works the same as the drug company drugs, but more natural and cheaper.
Scorpio
13th October 2009, 01:38 PM
I seem to have read about red/brown rice helping before as well; I had borderline high cholesterol, so do my parents, and it affects our memory when it goes up to 200+. I think assessors may be more concerned about high blood pressure than cholesterol per se. Try cutting down on seafood, especially prawns. Seems to have helped my family. ;)
All this stress must surely affect your efforts to conceive; here's wishing you the very best with your IVF too. :nice1 Read on another thread that coming to NZ helped with fertility; fingers crossed for a little Kiwi for you and your OH! :cheers
Something that may help re: lowering cholesterol. My mom back in the U.S. is in nursing and has had many patients needing to lower their cholesterol w/o paying for expensive drugs. They all swear by red yeast rice capsules, and apparently it works the same as the drug company drugs, but more natural and cheaper.
72andsunny
14th October 2009, 12:17 PM
They all swear by red yeast rice capsules, and apparently it works the same as the drug company drugs, but more natural and cheaper.
Lovastatin (also known as mevolin) is the active ingredient in red yeast rice. It's awfully cheap (in the US, at least)...I would not be surprised if red yeast capsules were more expensive. Less natural? In the same sense that eating moldy bread is more natural than taking penicillin. I don't know too many people who would go out and eat red yeast rice in nature...but I digress. Red yeast rice carries all the same side effect/drug interaction potential as lovastatin, with the added risk that you don't know exactly how much lovastatin you're getting in a capsule; please be careful adding any medication or nutritional supplement onto your daily routine.